The defining square for the subobject classifier is a pullback in a category:
The inverse image functor of a geometric morphism preserves this square and the terminal object. By definition, the inverse-image truth arrow is itself the pullback of along . Composing these two pullback squares shows that is the truth pullback along . Uniqueness of the characteristic map gives
Take two subobjects whose inverse images coincide. Their characteristic maps satisfy by part (i). Under the adjunction , these maps transpose to and , respectively, by naturality of the unit. If is a monomorphism, then and hence . Thus reflects equality of subobjects.
For parallel arrows with , their equalizer pulls back to all of . Reflection of equality with the whole subobject gives , so . Therefore the inverse image is faithful, and the geometric morphism is surjective. This is the surjectivity detected by the subobject classifier criterion. For completeness, faithfulness is equivalent here to conservativity: if is invertible, the image inclusion of and its kernel-pair diagonal become whole subobjects; reflection makes both a regular epimorphism and monic, hence invertible in the topos.
Suppose is a surjective geometric morphism, so is faithful. First, if a monomorphism becomes an isomorphism, then its characteristic map and the constantly true map become equal after : by part (i), the pulled-back subobject is the whole object, and equivalently because is epic and these maps agree after precomposition with it. Faithfulness gives , so was already invertible.
Now let satisfy . Adjunction and part (i) identify their pulled-back subobjects . Each inclusion consequently becomes an isomorphism. By the preceding argument it already is an isomorphism, so and . This works for every test object , proving

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.