The Riemann mapping theorem asserts that a nonempty simply connected domain is biholomorphic to the unit disk . More precisely, for each there is a unique biholomorphism satisfying and . We prove existence through an extremal derivative, deriving the compactness and injectivity steps rather than assuming special lemmas for the theorem.
First construct a bounded univalent function on . Choose and a holomorphic logarithm of , which exists by the permitted logarithm result on the translated simply connected domain. Put
Then , so is univalent and never zero. Its image is open, and : equality would imply after squaring and then .
Fix and choose with . It follows that is disjoint from , so throughout . Hence
is a univalent function with . For , define
The identity
and the inverse show directly that is an automorphism of the unit disk. Apply to and then a rotation to make its nonzero derivative at positive. The family of univalent maps with value zero and positive derivative at is therefore nonempty.
Let
It is positive. Choose with . The Cauchy estimate gives for every , so is finite. Take a sequence with .
We now justify a locally uniform convergence subsequence. On any compact subset of , the bound and the Cauchy estimate on slightly larger interior disks give a uniform derivative bound. They therefore give equicontinuity. Apply the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem on a compact exhaustion of , then take a diagonal subsequence for locally uniform convergence. Its limit is holomorphic: pass to the limit in the Cauchy integral formula on every small interior circle. The same formula for derivatives gives
Thus is nonconstant. Initially , and the maximum modulus principle improves this to everywhere.
For completeness, the needed locally uniform limit of univalent functions argument is short. If and , the nonconstant holomorphic function has an isolated zero at . Choose a small closed disk around excluding , with no zero on its boundary. Uniform convergence there gives . The Rouche theorem then makes have a zero inside that disk for all sufficiently large . Its only possible zero, by injectivity of , is , outside the disk. This contradiction proves injectivity of . Therefore and attains the supremum .
It remains to prove surjectivity. Suppose is omitted by ; since , necessarily . The domain is simply connected, because both constituent maps are homeomorphisms onto their images, and it excludes zero. The permitted holomorphic logarithm gives a holomorphic square root
This maps into and is univalent, since equality of its values implies equality after squaring and hence equality of the original arguments. Write . Then and . Normalize again with and a rotation. Its derivative magnitude is
The strict inequality follows from . This square-root improvement of a normalized conformal map contradicts extremality. Thus . An injective holomorphic map has nonzero derivative and a holomorphic local inverse; these inverses agree, so the resulting bijection is biholomorphic. We have proved existence.
For uniqueness, two normalized maps give an automorphism of the unit disk fixing zero. Apply the Schwarz lemma, proved in the next part, to this automorphism and its inverse. Both inequalities force equality, so the equality case makes it a rotation. Its derivative at zero is the positive real number , forcing that rotation to be the identity. Therefore
The proper-domain hypothesis is necessary: a bounded entire holomorphic function has derivative at most on disks of arbitrarily large radius by the Cauchy estimate, and hence is constant. Conversely, a domain biholomorphic to the disk is simply connected because the map is a homeomorphism.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.