Urysohn's lemma states that disjoint closed subsets of a normal space admit a continuous with and . Using the usual convention, normal spaces are also .
The Tietze extension theorem states that a continuous real-valued function on a closed subset of a normal space extends continuously to the whole space. If its range lies in a closed bounded interval, the extension may be chosen in that same interval.
Prove first the interval version for . If a continuous residual on obeys , the sets and are disjoint closed subsets of . Urysohn's lemma gives a continuous taking the endpoint values on those two sets. On each of the three ranges of , it follows that on . Repeating with produces with and a residual bounded by . The series converges uniformly, has absolute value at most , is continuous and restricts to as the residual tends to zero. Rescaling proves every closed bounded interval version.
For unbounded , first extend to . The closed set is disjoint from . Urysohn's lemma gives with and . Then takes values strictly between minus one and one everywhere and equals on . Thus is a continuous real-valued extension of , proving the full theorem.
Statement 1 is true: metric spaces are normal, and the bounded interval form applies. Statement 2 is true: compact Hausdorff spaces are normal, and the unrestricted real-valued form applies. Statement 3 is false. For a counterexample, let have open sets . The subset is closed and discrete, so , is continuous on it. Every open neighborhood of or in contains . A continuous extension would pull back disjoint neighborhoods of minus one and one to disjoint open sets containing and , yet both would contain . This is impossible.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.