We use the normalized Gowers U3 norm on an interval, for which a quadratic phase has norm one. Let consist of integer tuples whose eight vertices , , all lie in . If denotes complex conjugation, defineEquivalently, choose a prime , extend by zero to , call that extension , and put . ThenThe large ambient modulus prevents wraparound in cubes supported on the interval, so the ratio is independent of the chosen such . This also proves nonnegativity and the norm properties by the Gowers uniformity norm on . Some conventions omit the denominator; their interval norm differs by a fixed bounded factor, and the quadratic-phase norm is then .
For , the exponent in every conjugated cube product is a third additive difference of a quadratic polynomial and is zero. Thus in the normalized interval convention.
The generalized von Neumann inequality for four-term progressions connects this norm to counting arithmetic progressions. For functions bounded by one on a cyclic group of prime order greater than three,Three applications of Cauchy-Schwarz prove the bound. Zero extension and division by the number of interval progressions give the analogous interval estimate up to an absolute constant. In particular, if , where , has small Gowers U3 norm on an interval, expansion of the progression count shows that it differs from times the count for by . A large Gowers U3 norm detects structure capable of changing four-term progression counts; quadratic phases are the basic example.
For the remaining proof use the ambient just specified, define , and take averages uniformly on . For frequencies not on the character grid, an exponential is evaluated at the chosen integer representatives; the general proof below selects actual characters . The printed question does not define or the interval normalization, so these conventions make the assertion precise. If instead is used, conjugate the correlations and reverse every frequency sign; the quadratic example then has .
The Gowers U3 norm derivative identity isLet . Since , by repeated Cauchy-Schwarz, the interval hypothesis gives . Also . Therefore the sethas density at least in .
Use normalized Fourier coefficients on a finite abelian group . The Gowers U2 norm and Parseval identity giveFor , the final mean is at most one. Thus each has a frequency withThe derivative is identically zero unless is represented by an integer in , so lies in the requested interval of shifts. Its size is . Keep one such frequency for each shift; these same choices will satisfy the energy conclusion below.
Write and . Choose unit complex numbers so thatis real and nonnegative. Cauchy-Schwarz, using , bounds byAfter setting , each summand is a unit phase times the Fourier coefficient on a finite abelian group of at frequency .
Let count pairs with and . Grouping terms, another Cauchy-Schwarz and the Parseval identity yieldwhere is the additive energy of a frequency graph. The last inequality uses for each .
ThusThe bound proves that derivative correlations force additive frequency energy. This energy counts exactly the ordered quadruples satisfying the two requested additive relations, after relabelling the difference equality as a sum equality. Shift equalities initially hold modulo , but the shifts lie in and , so they are also integer equalities. Frequency equalities hold in , as required. Consequently a common exponent works for both conclusions, after adjusting absolute implicit constants and using .
For the quadratic phase, the multiplicative derivative on the overlap is . Hence an explicit choice isTake . The correlation magnitude is , and every additive quadruple of shifts satisfies the frequency relation. The interval of shifts has such quadruples by Cauchy-Schwarz. These particular real frequencies need not belong to the grid used to prove existence for general ; evaluating them at the interval's integer coordinates gives the stated exact formula.
A genuinely nonlinear example is the bracket-linear frequency functionIt has exact additive quadruples, yet agrees with any affine function at only shifts, uniformly in the affine function. The question permits giving this example without proof, but the mechanism is useful. For a pair with sum , the value has only two possibilities, or . There are pair classes, so Cauchy-Schwarz produces collisions with both additive relations.
To see why no long affine agreement occurs, three agreement points force the corresponding lattice points to be collinear: eliminating the affine slope gives times an integer determinant equal to an integer, and irrationality makes that determinant zero. A rational line of slope contains agreement shifts in one residue class modulo , and closeness of to bounds their span by . Lines with large have arbitrarily small possible density; for bounded , irrationality of bounds the number uniformly. Thus the maximum agreement is .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.