Use the kernel squares in an abelian category argument. If is monic and , satisfy , then , so . The kernel in a category property gives a unique with . The equation and monicity of give . This proves the left square is a pullback in a category.
Now suppose the right square is a pullback, without imposing the earlier monicity hypothesis on . The pair gives a unique with and . Factor through the kernel. Then , so . Also and have the same two pullback projections, hence . Thus and . Therefore is an isomorphism. These arguments use only the relevant kernels, zero arrows and pullback properties; the abelian hypothesis supplies them.
In an abelian category, the image factorization in an abelian category of is
where the abelian-category axiom identifies coimage with image. Thus is epic and is monic. Any other epi-mono factorization has and . Since epimorphisms are cokernels of their kernels, its middle object is canonically isomorphic to , uniquely compatibly with the two factors.
For a square , define by
The first arrow exists because factors through , so annihilates . Its composite with equals after the epimorphism , proving the second equation. Uniqueness after proves preservation of identities and composition. This gives the functoriality of abelian image factorization as a functor from the arrow category.
For pullback stability of abelian image factorization, state the standard facts that pullbacks preserve monomorphisms, epimorphisms in an abelian category are stable under pullback, and two adjoining pullback squares have pullback outer rectangle. In the given diagram, is therefore monic and is epic, while the composite is the pullback of . Its epi-mono factorization is an image factorization by the uniqueness just proved. Thus the top row is the image factorization of the pulled-back arrow, with its middle object canonically the pullback of the original image subobject.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.