For a finite Galois extension of local fields, let , , and, for integers , define the lower ramification groups byIn particular, is the inertia group. The identity satisfies every bound because .
If the extension is totally ramified, its residue fields agree. Choose representatives in of their common residue field. Every has a convergent uniformiser expansion with these representatives , all fixed by . For ,Each summand in the second factor has valuation . Thus a bound implies the same bound on , by convergence and the valuation inequality. Necessity follows by testing . This proves the uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups:
Put , with . The shifted cyclotomic polynomial is Eisenstein at : its constant term is , and modulo it is . Therefore is totally ramified of degree and is a uniformiser.
The Galois group is , with . For , let , . Then is a primitive th root. Its difference from one is a uniformiser in the corresponding smaller cyclotomic field, and the relative ramification index is . HenceThe uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups now determines every group. Write , with . Then the lower ramification filtration of a prime-power cyclotomic extension isFor the middle range is empty and the extension is tame. The formula also includes ; then is already the whole group, so the first possible drop is later than in the odd-prime case. For , the entire extension is trivial.
Write and . The cubic is Eisenstein and adjoining adds at most a quadratic extension, so . SetUsing and , compute and . Thus satisfies the Eisenstein polynomial . This proves , degree six, with a uniformiser and the extension totally ramified. It is the splitting field of , so its Galois group is . This is the Eisenstein sextic presentation of the splitting field of X3 minus 3 over Q3.
If , use . Then . The coefficient reduces to in the residue field , so the difference has valuation one. These three automorphisms are the transpositions.
The uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups consequently givesAs a consistency check, the different exponent is . The derivative of the monogenic Eisenstein polynomial gives the same value, . In particular, stopping the wild filtration at would give the wrong different.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.