A monomorphism is a morphism such that implies for every pair . Dually, an epimorphism satisfies . A regular epimorphism is a coequalizer of some parallel pair. An isomorphism has a two-sided inverse.
For a product in a category, write for its categorical diagonal. Since , equality gives . Thus the diagonal is a monomorphism, indeed a split monomorphism.
Here use the left lifting property against monomorphisms as the definition of “strong”; epimorphicity will be established separately. In a lifting square write , , and , with and a monomorphism. Any two lifts agree because .
First let be the coequalizer of . Every coequalizer is an epimorphism: if , the uniqueness clause for the coequalizer applied to this common composite gives . Moreover,
so by monomorphism cancellation. The coequalizer therefore supplies with . Then , and epimorphism cancellation gives . This proves that regular epimorphisms are strong epimorphisms.
If is also a monomorphism, take , and . Its lift satisfies and . Hence monic lifting-only strong morphisms are invertible.
Next suppose has the left lifting property against monomorphisms. Given a lifting square for , with , precompose its top arrow with . A lift for gives with and . Crucially, one does not cancel : instead , and the monomorphism gives . Thus the right factor of a strong composite is strong, proving right-factor cancellation for lifting-only strong morphisms.
Finally, in with strong and monic, the preceding result makes strong. The monic-strong argument then makes an isomorphism. None of these arguments assumed that a lifting-only strong morphism was already epic.
Let have the left lifting property against monomorphisms, and suppose satisfy . Use the categorical diagonal , which is a monomorphism by part (a). The square with top arrow , bottom arrow , left arrow and right arrow commutes, since both product components are .
Its lift satisfies . Applying the two product in a category projections gives and . Thus is an epimorphism. This binary-product criterion for lifting-only strong epimorphisms requires binary products, rather than any assumption about equalizers.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.