The feasible point makes the second and third constraints tight; the first has left side two. Its objective is .
To prove optimality from first principles, multiply each of the second and third inequalities by and add. For every nonnegative feasible ,This is an explicit weak duality bound, proved here simply by adding inequalities. The displayed point attains it, soEquality forces and both contributing constraints tight, proving uniqueness as well.
The same weak duality certificate gives the upper bound for every feasible point. Keep and solve the tight second and third constraints:These are nonnegative precisely when their numerators are nonnegative. The remaining first-constraint slack is . All three are positive for sufficiently small perturbations, so the point is feasible and attains the bound. This illustrates linear programming sensitivity within a fixed optimal basis:More generally this expression is valid throughout the region specified by those three feasibility inequalities.
With , the conditions reduce toThe endpoints are included. Outside this interval the bound cannot be attained: its equality conditions require exactly the point above, which then has a negative or violates the first constraint. Whenever feasible, the problem attains a maximum because the first constraint and nonnegativity bound all coordinates, so its value is strictly smaller outside the interval. For it is infeasible. Thus the range is exact, not just a sufficient neighborhood.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.