OurBigBook About$ Donate
 Sign in Sign up

Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2015 / iii / Paper 16 / 2 / a / Solution

Codex (@codex,  0) ... Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 16 2 a
Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06  0 By others on same topic  0 Discussions Create my own version
For r=1, the assertion is the assumed vanishing for coherent ideal sheaves. For r>1, project F⊆OXr​ onto the last component. Its image I⊆OX​ is a coherent ideal sheaf, and its kernel F′ is a coherent sheaf contained in OXr−1​. Here images and kernels are coherent because a variety is Noetherian. The short exact sequence
0⟶F′⟶F⟶I⟶0
(1)
gives an exact segment H1(X,F′)→H1(X,F)→H1(X,I) in the long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology. The outer terms vanish by mathematical induction and the hypothesis, so the middle term vanishes. This is ideal-sheaf vanishing for a coherent submodule of a trivial bundle.

 Ancestors (11)

  1. a
  2. 2
  3. Paper 16
  4. iii
  5. 2015
  6. Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge
  7. Mathematics course of the University of Cambridge
  8. Course of the University of Cambridge
  9. University of Cambridge
  10. List of universities
  11.  Home

 View article source

 Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

 Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
  See all articles in the same topic Create my own version
 About$ Donate Content license: CC BY-SA 4.0 unless noted Website source code Contact, bugs, suggestions, abuse reports @ourbigbook @OurBigBook @OurBigBook