For a locally small category , an object , and a categorical presheaf , the Yoneda lemma gives the natural bijectionIts two maps are explicitlyFor , the equation proves naturality of . Evaluating it at the identity morphism gives . Conversely, naturality of at givesso . Evaluation at the identity and transport of an element along a morphism are mutually inverse.
The bijection is natural in both variables: a natural transformation sends to , matching ; and givesFor completeness, the covariant Yoneda lemma for is , with and inverse .
For the categorical presheaf , its category of elements has objects with . A morphism is a morphism satisfying . Composition in a category is inherited from : if also , then . The identity morphisms are inherited as well. The forgetful functor sends to and to .
A universal element is a pair for which each is uniquely of the form for . Thus is a terminal object of the category of elements, with the variance appropriate to a categorical presheaf.
Given a universal element, defineThe defining uniqueness makes each map a bijection; gives naturality for . Hence is a natural isomorphism and is a representable presheaf. Conversely, from a natural isomorphism , take . The Yoneda lemma gives ; its bijectivity makes a universal element. Therefore the two descriptions coincide:
For in , conjugate the induced natural transformation by the chosen representations of a functor:The Yoneda lemma gives a unique morphism whose postcomposition map is . Explicitly,Consequently, for every ,This is precisely the required naturality in . The identities and force and , because the Yoneda embedding is fully faithful. Thus the representing objects extend uniquely to a functor . Uniqueness follows by the same Yoneda lemma: any candidate satisfying that naturality must induce , so must have exactly the displayed action on morphisms.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.