The tableau is the three-stage Lobatto IIIA method. To check its order of a Runge-Kutta method directly, write , , and . The eight fourth-order conditions for a Runge-Kutta method evaluate to
Powers of here mean componentwise powers. For example, , , and , which make the last three checks immediate. These Butcher order conditions establish order at least four for general nonlinear ordinary differential equations.
It is not order five: part (b)'s stability function has expansion
The fifth coefficient already fails on the Dahlquist test equation. The order is exactly four.
For a Runge-Kutta method, the stability function is . Solving the stage equations on the Dahlquist test equation gives
The denominator has roots of a polynomial , both in the open right half-plane. If , direct expansion gives
Since , the modulus of is at most one exactly when . Thus
The method is A-stable. Its stability function has unit modulus on the imaginary axis and tends to one as , so it is not L-stable.
The criterion for algebraic stability of a Runge-Kutta method is and positive semidefiniteness of
The Runge-Kutta contractivity identity implies that this criterion is sufficient for B-stability, namely contractivity for a dissipative vector field, whenever the stage equations are defined. The implication from algebraic stability to B-stability is the relevant nonlinear theorem; A-stability alone is a linear property.
All weights here are positive, but
A positive semidefinite matrix cannot have this negative quadratic value. Hence the method is not algebraically stable. Failure of this sufficient criterion alone would not be a proof of failure of B-stability; no such converse is needed for the question.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.