In a matrix game, entry is the row player's payoff, and the column player's payoff is . A mixed strategy is a probability vector over the available rows or columns. With strategies , the row payoff is . Its optimal mixed strategy maximizes its guaranteed payoff, while the column player minimizes the largest row payoff:The equality is the finite minimax theorem. Equivalently the row player maximizes , and the column player minimizes . Each optimal strategy guarantees its corresponding bound against every opponent strategy; for the column player's own negative payoff this is also a maximin strategy.
For a real antisymmetric matrix , for every real vector . Thus for each row strategy , the column player could choose , giving . Hence the row security value is at most zero. Conversely, for each column strategy , the row choice gives , so the column security value is at least zero. The minimax theorem equates these values, provingThe choices matching the opponent in this proof establish inequalities for security levels; they do not by themselves specify a single universal optimal strategy.
In this consecutive-number antisymmetric game, with the row player's number denoted , the payoff matrix isIt is an antisymmetric matrix, so the matrix game has value zero for every . For ,satisfies and , proving optimality for both players.
For any larger , extend the same strategy by zero probabilities:Indeed, the first three coordinates of are zero. For , ; for , all three supported numbers are at least two below , so . Hence and, by antisymmetry, . The column player using prevents positive payoff, while the row player using prevents negative payoff, a mixed-strategy optimality certificate for a matrix game. This explicitly checks all the additional strategies rather than assuming the three-number subgame remains optimal.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.