A single-box up-move from row to row changes the partial sum through row by
Every change is nonnegative, so in the dominance order on partitions. Transitivity gives the same conclusion along any chain of up-moves. Thus the existence of the indicated chain implies dominance. A chain of length zero handles equality; each positive-length move must still leave a partition of an integer.
Suppose in the dominance order on partitions and . Let be the first unequal row. Then . Put
We have , and eventually . Let be its first return to zero. Then for and .
Move one box from row to row . Increasing row is legal: if , then . Decreasing row is also legal. If , then , forcing , a contradiction. Also . Thus the new list is a partition of an integer.
The new deficits equal on and elsewhere, so . The quantity decreases by two, since the changed rows were a deficit and a surplus. Repeating must terminate at . Hence
The construction proves both termination and preservation of the intermediate dominance inequalities.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.