An integral form of a group representation is a -stable finite free -submodule with . Such a form exists: take a basis lattice and replace it by , which is finite and torsion-free and therefore free over the discrete valuation ring .
Choose ordinary simple modules with forms , and modular simple modules with projective covers . With a uniformizer, put . The decomposition matrix and Cartan matrix of a group algebra have entriesThe first numbers do not depend on the integral form: the Brauer character of its reduction is the ordinary character restricted to p-regular elements, and part 2(a) determines all composition multiplicities from this restriction.
For the assertion in (i), set . It is a submodule of the finite free module , hence is finite free over . There is a natural injective mapFor any homomorphism in the target, clearing the finitely many denominators of its values on an -basis of gives . Thus , and the map is surjective. Therefore , regarding this Hom space as a vector space. The original PDF supplies part (i), which is missing from the supplied TeX.
Write . Certainly multiplication by sends every -homomorphism to one with image in . Conversely, if is such a homomorphism, define . This is well defined because is torsion-free. Cancellation of shows that is -linear and commutes with the -action. Hence , andThis step in reduction of Hom from a projective group-algebra lattice does not itself require projectivity.
Put . Since is a projective module, its Hom functor is exact. Applied to , it givesThe kernel is by (ii). Every map to kills and factors uniquely through ; this gives the second isomorphism. ThereforeBy (i), is finite free with rank . Its reduction has dimension equal to that rank. Thus reduction of Hom from a projective group-algebra lattice yieldsThe original PDF has the group-algebra subscripts used here; the supplied TeX drops or corrupts several of them.
Completeness permits idempotent lifting from to . In particular, each projective cover lifts to a finite projective -lattice ; one can lift an idempotent presenting it as a summand of a finite free module. Set .
For a simple , every map factors through its simple head . Splitting and Schur lemma give . Exactness of this Hom functor along a composition series therefore givesPart (iii) identifies this with . By Maschke's theorem and splitting, is split semisimple, soThe reductions of any two integral forms of the same ordinary module have identical Brauer characters, hence identical composition multiplicities. We may thus reduce a direct-sum form for the displayed decomposition instead of . In the modular representation ring this givesComparing the simple basis coefficients proves , or .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.