Under the frozen-age exponential distribution convention, the mean waiting time is the reciprocal of the outgoing transition intensity. The beliefs therefore specifyBoth rates double over ten years. ConsequentlyThese calibrate the age-specific constant-rate means; they are not exact mean ages of future events when age-dependent rates continue increasing throughout the waiting time.
For a literal continuously ageing interpretation, a rate gives a Gompertz distribution for the waiting time. For , its mean isHere is the exponential integral. Solving and , and the analogous pair with means 2 and 1, instead giveswith rates and slopes in inverse years. These are an alternative continuous-age calibration, not the frozen-age answer boxed above.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.