Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2018 / iii / Paper 340 / 2 / a

Use the Fourier transform convention $\hat{\phi }(\xi )=\int \phi (x)e^{-ix\xi }dx$. Nesting and the orthonormal basis of $V_1$ give the scaling refinement equationHere $h_k=⟨\phi ,\sqrt{2}\phi (2\cdot -k)⟩$. Compact support makes these inner products zero for all but finitely many $k$, so $m$ is a trigonometric polynomial. Expanding the orthogonality of the integer translates of $\phi$ in the orthonormal basis of $V_1$ yieldsConsequentlyThis holds everywhere because $m$ is continuous. The invoked properties are nesting, dyadic dilation, orthonormal integer translates, and compact support; mere finite-energy refinement would not imply the quadrature mirror filter identity.

The density axiom and continuity of the Fourier transform at zero imply $|\hat{\phi }(0)|=1$. Here is a proof that avoids assuming a normalization of the integral. Choose a nonzero $f$ whose Fourier transform has bounded support. The MRA projection Fourier identity, with no aliasing once $j$ is sufficiently large, isSince $\phi \in L^1$, its Fourier transform is continuous and bounded, so this tends to $|\hat{\phi }(0){|}^2\Vert f{\Vert }_2^2$. Density and nesting give $P_{j}f\to f$ in $L^2$. Thus $|\hat{\phi }(0)|=1$, in particular it is nonzero. Evaluating the scaling refinement equation in frequency at zero now giveswhich is stronger than the requested absolute-value equality. Multiplying the scaling function by a constant of modulus one normalizes its integral to one without changing $m$.