For a locally small category , the Yoneda lemma states thatnaturally in both and . Taking givesso the Yoneda embedding is full and faithful.
For small , the presheaf category has pointwise finite limits and colimits, exponentialand a subobject classifier whose elements at are sieves on . Hence it is a presheaf topos.
If has finite limits, the Yoneda embedding preserves them: maps into a limiting object are the corresponding limits of hom-sets. Its essential image is therefore a full subcategory of the presheaf topos closed under finite limits. Since Yoneda is full and faithful, this proves the assertion up to equivalence.
Suppose the small category is Cartesian closed. The Yoneda embedding preserves finite products. For , the Yoneda lemma and the exponential object adjunction giveThe bijections are natural in , soThus the essential image of in its presheaf topos is full and closed under finite products and exponentials.
Assume has finite products and every idempotent morphism splits. For a representable presheaf , the exponential formula givesThus exponentiation by is precomposition with . Precomposition has a Right Kan extension as right adjoint, so every representable presheaf is a tiny object.
Conversely, let be tiny. Then is a left adjoint and preserves all small colimits. Since has a terminal object , the terminal presheaf is , and evaluation at preserves colimits. Thereforepreserves all small colimits as a functor of . By the result supplied in the question, splitting idempotents implies that is representable. Hence the representable presheaves are the tiny objects of an idempotent-complete finite-product category, and Yoneda identifies with the full subcategory of tiny objects of its presheaf topos.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.