Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2019 / iii / Paper 148 / 2

The set $S=1+I$ is a multiplicative subset, since $(1+a)(1+b)=1+(a+b+ab)$. The localization of a ring $S^{-1}R$ consists of fractions $r/s$, whereSimilarly, the localization of a module $S^{-1}M$ consists of fractions $m/s$, with the analogous equivalence relation. The canonical maps areThe Localization of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian. Since a finitely generated module over a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian module, localizing a finite generating set shows that $S^{-1}M$ is Noetherian over $S^{-1}R$.

The prime ideal correspondence for localization identifies $\mathrm{Spec}{S}^{-1}R$ with the primes $P\in \mathrm{Spec}R$ disjoint from $S$. Hereso the spectrum of localization away from one plus an ideal is

An element $m$ maps to zero exactly when $(1+a)m=0$ for some $a\in I$. Such an equation gives $m=(-a{)}^{j}m\in I^{j}M$ for every $j$, proving one inclusion. Conversely, suppose $m\in {\bigcap }_{j\ge 1}{I}^{j}M$. The Artin-Rees lemma applied to $Rm\subseteq M$ says that for some $c$,Taking $n=c+1$ gives $m\in I(Rm)$, so $m=am$ for some $a\in I$. Then $(1-a)m=0$ and $1-a\in S$. Thus

For failure without Noetherianity, takeThe strict chain $(t)⊊(t^{1/2})⊊(t^{1/4})⊊\cdots$ shows that $R$ is not Noetherian. Since $t^q=(t^{q/2}{)}^2$, one has $I^2=I$, and hence ${\bigcap }_j{I}^j=I\ne 0$. But $R$ is an integral domain, so its localization map into $(1+I{)}^{-1}R$ is injective. This is the non-Noetherian failure of the intersection formula for localization.