The Laurent theorem says that if is analytic on an annulus
then it has a unique Laurent series
converging locally uniformly on that annulus, where
for any positively oriented circle in the annulus around .
An isolated singularity at is a point at which is not analytic although it is analytic on some punctured neighbourhood. It is removable when every with vanishes; it is a pole of order when and for ; and it is essential when infinitely many negative-index coefficients are nonzero.
For ,
For ,
The coefficients are unique after the annulus is fixed; these expansions differ because they represent the function on different annuli. At zero the first expansion has principal part , so zero is a simple pole with residue .
Put . The hypothesis gives as , so defining makes continuous on and analytic there by the stated assumption. Its zero at has some finite order , and hence
Therefore
has a pole of order : its Laurent series has and for .
Now let be entire and tend to infinity at infinity. The function
tends to infinity as , so the preceding argument says that has a pole at zero. If the Taylor series of is , then
A pole has only finitely many negative powers, so for all sufficiently large . Thus is a polynomial.
For
both and have a simple zero at zero. Hence has a simple pole, and its residue is
For , multiplication of the two Laurent series shows that all powers are even:
There are infinitely many negative powers, so zero is an essential singularity. There is no term, and therefore

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.