The Laurent theorem says that if is analytic on an annulusthen it has a unique Laurent seriesconverging locally uniformly on that annulus, wherefor any positively oriented circle in the annulus around .
An isolated singularity at is a point at which is not analytic although it is analytic on some punctured neighbourhood. It is removable when every with vanishes; it is a pole of order when and for ; and it is essential when infinitely many negative-index coefficients are nonzero.
For ,For ,The coefficients are unique after the annulus is fixed; these expansions differ because they represent the function on different annuli. At zero the first expansion has principal part , so zero is a simple pole with residue .
Put . The hypothesis gives as , so defining makes continuous on and analytic there by the stated assumption. Its zero at has some finite order , and henceThereforehas a pole of order : its Laurent series has and for .
Now let be entire and tend to infinity at infinity. The functiontends to infinity as , so the preceding argument says that has a pole at zero. If the Taylor series of is , thenA pole has only finitely many negative powers, so for all sufficiently large . Thus is a polynomial.
For , multiplication of the two Laurent series shows that all powers are even:There are infinitely many negative powers, so zero is an essential singularity. There is no term, and therefore
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.