Assume . For each , define the bounded functionalWeak convergence makes convergent, hence bounded, for every . The Uniform boundedness principle givesBy the Riesz representation theorem, , so is bounded.
Taking in the definition of weak convergence in a Hilbert space givesfor every . Thus (i) implies (ii).
Conversely, supposeand defineFor every , Bessel inequality and passage to the limit giveHence . The partial sums are therefore Cauchy; completeness of the Hilbert space gives an element
Let . For fixed , coordinate convergence givesThe Hilbertian basis property gives , andFirst choose large and then large. This provesfor every , so . This establishes the coordinate criterion for weak convergence in a separable Hilbert space.
Let . For each , Bessel inequality givesso the th coordinate sequence is bounded. By the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem, choose a subsequence on which the first coordinate converges. From it choose a further subsequence on which the second coordinate converges, and continue.
Take the diagonal subsequence . For every fixed , its th coordinate converges, and it remains bounded by . The coordinate criterion for weak convergence in a separable Hilbert space supplies an such thatThis proves the theorem on a weak subsequence of a bounded Hilbert-space sequence.
It also implies (iii). Given , choose so thatBy the Parseval identity for a Hilbertian basis, choose so that the basis tail of beyond is less than . For and ,There are only finitely many , so increasing makes each of their tails less than . Thus one works for every , proving (iii).
Assume (ii). Weak convergence givesUsing the inner product identity,Hence (ii) implies (i); this is the Radon-Riesz theorem in a Hilbert space.
Assume (iii), and let . Choose such thatfor every . Coordinate convergence implies, for every finite ,Letting shows that the corresponding tail of is also at most .
By the Parseval identity for a Hilbertian basis,The finite first sum tends to zero by weak coordinate convergence, while the second is at mostSince is arbitrary, . Thus (iii) implies (i), completing the equivalence and proving the uniform basis-tail criterion for strong convergence.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.