Extension and contraction give the prime ideal correspondence for localization
Explicitly, maps to , while maps to . Primality follows by clearing denominators, and the two operations are inverse because an ideal in a localization contains exactly when it contains .
The weak Hilbert Nullstellensatz says that if a field is a finitely generated algebra over , then it is a finite algebraic extension of . Since every maximal ideal is prime, the nilradical is contained in the Jacobson radical .
Conversely, let be nonnilpotent. Then , and it is a finitely generated -algebra, so it has a maximal ideal . Its contraction to avoids . Moreover,
is a finitely generated -domain inside a finite algebraic extension of , hence is itself a field. Thus is maximal and does not contain . Therefore , proving

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.