The localization is the zero ring exactly when , which means that some is zero. Thus . This holds exactly when contains a nilpotent element: if and , multiplicative closure gives , while zero itself is nilpotent.
Let . Since becomes invertible in and , every becomes zero. The mapis therefore a well-defined ring isomorphism, with inverse .
For a subring , letIf is in lowest terms, Bézout gives integers with , soEvery prime divisor of then satisfies . Conversely, every rational whose denominator uses only primes in lies in . Hence all intermediate rings are exactlywhere is generated by an arbitrary set of primes. For example, , so .
For , choose a monic equation over ,Choose nonzero with for every . Multiplying by shows that satisfieswhose coefficients lie in . Thus and
Extension and contraction give the prime ideal correspondence for localizationExplicitly, maps to , while maps to . Primality follows by clearing denominators, and the two operations are inverse because an ideal in a localization contains exactly when it contains .
The weak Hilbert Nullstellensatz says that if a field is a finitely generated algebra over , then it is a finite algebraic extension of . Since every maximal ideal is prime, the nilradical is contained in the Jacobson radical .
Conversely, let be nonnilpotent. Then , and it is a finitely generated -algebra, so it has a maximal ideal . Its contraction to avoids . Moreover,is a finitely generated -domain inside a finite algebraic extension of , hence is itself a field. Thus is maximal and does not contain . Therefore , proving
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.