If , then for every ,
so the diagonal operator on sequence space is bounded. Conversely, for the standard unit vector ,
so boundedness of implies .
Part i gives . Conversely, choose indices with . Since ,
Taking the limit proves , whether or not the supremum is attained.
The Moore-Penrose inverse acts coordinatewise as
on the domain
The coordinates supported where form and are sent to zero. The inverse is continuous exactly when the nonzero diagonal entries are bounded away from zero,
apart from the trivial all-zero operator, whose inverse is zero. Otherwise unit vectors along entries tending to zero show that is unbounded.
For , the equation forces . It has a solution in exactly when
For example, defines an element of , but its forced preimage is the constant sequence , which is not in . Thus existence can fail. Since every is nonzero, has trivial kernel and any solution is unique.
The proposed stability property is false. Set , , and take . Then
while for every . Hence the inverse is not continuous on its range and the recovery problem is not stable with respect to perturbations. This is the standard unbounded inverse on a nonclosed operator range.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.