LetThe map is reflection about and is an isometry. It interchanges , so it preserves . Inductively, if it preserves , then it preserves its diameter and all distances in the defining condition for ; hence it preserves every .
The midpoint belongs to becauseSuppose . For every , reflection invariance gives andThus , so all the sets are nonempty and contain .
Put . If with , then and the defining property of givesThereforeIf lies in every , then both and lie in , soHence . We have proved the metric extraction of a midpoint by shrinking diameters:
Here “isometry” is used in the standard Mazur-Ulam theorem sense of a surjective distance-preserving map. Surjectivity is needed; a merely distance-preserving embedding need not preserve midpoints, as shown by a nonsurjective isometry need not preserve midpoints.
Distance preservation and surjectivity giveAssume inductively thatThen the two sets have the same diameter, and the universal distance condition defining the next set transfers through the bijection . Hencefor every .
Because is injective, it also preserves the intersection of this nested family. Part (a) therefore givesThus
Assume . Applying midpoint preservation to and givesso . Consequently,Thus is additive. It follows successively that
An isometry is continuous. For any , choose rationals . ThenTogether with additivity, this proves that is real-linear. Hence the origin-fixing case of the Mazur-Ulam theorem givesfor all and .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.