Assume the axiom of choice. By the well-ordering theorem, every set is bijective with an ordinal, and hence with an initial ordinal. Any two ordinals are comparable, so for any sets either injects into or injects into . Transitivity is immediate, and antisymmetry on cardinalities follows from the Cantor-Schröder-Bernstein theorem. Thus cardinal comparison is a total order.
Conversely, assume the cardinal comparability principle. Given any set , let be its Hartogs ordinal. By Hartogs theorem, there is no injection . Comparability therefore supplies an injection . Pulling the ordinal order back to gives a well-order of . Hence every set can be well-ordered, and the well-ordering theorem implies the axiom of choice.
Under the axiom of choice, identify every infinite cardinal with its initial ordinal. We prove by transfinite induction on infinite cardinals. The countable case follows from the usual diagonal enumeration of .
For the induction step, well-order the Cartesian product by first comparingand then using lexicographic order among pairs with the same maximum. The predecessors of lie in , where . Put . If is infinite, the induction hypothesis makes this predecessor set have cardinal at most ; if is finite, the same conclusion is immediate.
Let be the order type of this well-order. Every proper initial segment of therefore has cardinal less than . Hence , since otherwise its initial segment of order type would have cardinal . Thus . The map gives the reverse injection, and the Cantor-Schröder-Bernstein theorem yields
Letbe the injection witnessing , and fix . Extend the inverse of to a surjectionby settingThis construction uses only the fixed pair, not the axiom of choice.
Restrict to the -summand and take its second coordinate:If is onto, it is the required surjective function from to .
Otherwise choose one . For each , surjectivity of gives a preimage of . No such preimage lies in the -summand, by the choice of , so it lies in the -summand. Unless , this preimage is exactly and is unique: all points outside the range of map only to the default pair. Distinct give distinct preimages because is injective.
If , these unique preimages therefore define an injective function . The only exceptional case is , where they initially define an injectionIf is onto, extend it arbitrarily at to obtain a surjection . If it is not onto, choose one and set ; this gives an injection . These cases prove the product-sum comparison lemma entirely in ZF.
Part (b) proves one implication. Conversely, assume in ZF thatfor every infinite cardinal . Let be any set and let be its Hartogs ordinal. Finite is already well-orderable, so suppose is infinite and form the disjoint unionBy hypothesis, is bijective with . Since injects into , we obtain
Apply part (c), with and . It gives either an injection or a surjection . The first alternative contradicts Hartogs theorem. In the second, every fiber is a nonempty set of ordinals and therefore has a least member. The mapis an injection of into the ordinal and pulls its well-order back to . Thus every set is well-orderable, so the well-ordering theorem gives the axiom of choice. This proves the Tarski cardinal-square theorem.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.