If there are injections and , then there is a bijection .
For arbitrary sets and , the precise equivalence is
The reverse direction uses the bijection and its inverse function. Neither set is assumed to be a subset of the other: the hypothesis concerns functions, rather than containments. The forward direction holds in ZF without the axiom of choice.[ref]
This makes cardinality comparison an antisymmetric relation: if each set is no larger than the other in the sense of an injection, they have equal cardinality. It also gives a practical strategy: build two convenient injections and let the theorem supply the bijection. The Injection-chain proof of the Cantor-Schröder-Bernstein theorem explains how to combine them without losing an output or pairing two inputs with the same output.
Take , the nonnegative integers, and , the positive integers. Choose the injections
Here is an inclusion map, while reaches only the positive even integers. In particular, is not a bijection: it misses every positive odd integer. Simply using the inverse function of on its image misses input zero.
The remedy is to follow the alternating injections starting at the missing input zero:
The subscripts distinguish an input in from an output in , even when their numerical values agree. The resulting subset of is . Its sequence of members satisfies and , giving by mathematical induction. Define the function
Figure 1.
A bijection moves only the sequence
. The upper row alternates the original injections and . Solid blue arrows are the chosen bijection on ; dashed gray arrows only continue the chain. Below, examples outside use and keep their numerical values. Every displayed number belongs to the explicitly constructed example. Details.
The image covers all the positive members of exactly once. The other inputs cover exactly once by staying fixed. These output sets are disjoint and their union is , proving that is a bijection. In particular, , , , while and .
For completeness, its inverse function is
The familiar bijection also works, but this example shows something more specific: the two chosen injections can repair the missing zero by moving only a sparse sequence of inputs. The repair never has to shift the entire set.
Given injections and , start with the set difference : these are exactly the inputs for which is unavailable. Follow both functions repeatedly, using the natural-number recursion theorem to define
Thus contains all the members reachable from any starting point in . The notation and denotes images of a function. If is the empty set, then every is empty and alone gives the desired bijection.
Figure 1.
The Injection-chain proof of the Cantor-Schröder-Bernstein theorem partitions the inputs into two matching rules
. The upper row shows a chain seeded in , where the bijection follows . The lower row shows a chain beginning in , where the bijection reverses . The same rule also handles chains with no starting point and closed loops. Separate and copies are used even if the original sets overlap. Details.
Define a function on all of by
Here is the inverse function from to , obtained by restricting the codomain of to its image. It is well defined because is injective. Every belongs to , since , so the second rule is always available where it is used.
The decisive set identity is
The last equality holds because every with lies in , whereas is disjoint from . Consequently, for any ,
Indeed, cannot belong to ; if it lies in , the identity gives for some , and injectivity gives . The converse follows directly by applying .
Now restricts to a bijection from onto . The displayed equivalence says that restricts to a bijection from onto , so its inverse function bijects the remaining inputs with the remaining outputs. The two input sets partition and the two output sets partition . Their combined function is therefore both injective and surjective.
No choice function is needed: is fixed by the given injections, and each required is unique. We neither choose a representative from each chain nor enumerate . This is a proof in ordinary classical ZF, even when no well-ordering of the sets exists there.[ref]

Ancestors (6)

  1. Cardinal number
  2. Set theory
  3. Foundations of mathematics
  4. Area of mathematics
  5. Mathematics
  6. Home

Discussion (0) New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.