Uniform ellipticity means that there is such that the symmetric part of the principal coefficient matrix satisfies
for every and . This is the defining coercive bound for a uniformly elliptic operator.
Assume , the coefficients are bounded, and is bounded above. Choose so large that the bounded positive function satisfies
Also set . Boundedness of the coefficients, , and give a global upper bound .
For and , the function
tends to as and satisfies . If exceeded both zero and its values on , it would attain a positive interior maximum. At that point and , whence , a contradiction. Letting and then proves
This is the weak maximum principle for elliptic operators on the slab. The boundedness or a comparable growth condition is necessary because the domain is unbounded.
The weak maximum principle for elliptic operators fails without a condition at infinity. The function
is harmonic on the upper half-space, continuous on its closure, and vanishes on the boundary, but it is positive and unbounded in the interior.
For , the radial function
is harmonic on , vanishes on the unit sphere, and is positive in the domain. It therefore violates the weak maximum principle for elliptic operators. In two dimensions the corresponding counterexample is , since the fundamental solution of the Laplace equation changes from a power to a logarithm.
Take
Its principal symbol is , so it is elliptic, and . Yet satisfies on and vanishes at both boundary points while remaining positive inside. Thus second-order ellipticity is essential to the usual weak maximum principle for elliptic operators.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.