In an independent Bernoulli product space, an event is increasing if changing any coordinate from to cannot destroy it. Harris' inequality says that two increasing events satisfy
Equivalently, two decreasing events are positively correlated.
For Janson inequalities, let be a random subset of a finite ground set whose elements are selected independently, let be fixed subsets, and put
Write when and , and define the ordered dependency sum
The first Janson inequality is
The usual extended form is
There is also the complementary lower bound
and if for all , the product is at least .
For the proof, order arbitrarily and expose the avoidance events one at a time. The standard Janson sequential product lemma, obtained by conditioning and using Harris' inequality on the coordinates outside , gives
Using and summing the pair terms yields . If , this is at most . If , adjoin an independent Bernoulli coordinate of mean to each index and intersect with the event that its new coordinate is . The event implies that none of these thinned events occurs, while the thinned family has mean and dependency sum . Applying the first inequality in the enlarged product space gives
Finally, the events are decreasing, so repeated Harris' inequality proves the product lower bound; gives its exponential version.
Let count the triangles of the binomial random graph . Then
Two distinct triangle indicators are dependent only when the triangles share an edge. Hence their ordered Janson dependency sum is
If , then . The first Janson inequality gives
For the reverse bound, the events that individual triangles are absent are decreasing, so Harris' inequality gives
where keeps the logarithmic estimate uniform. Thus the probability is .
If , the extended Janson bound gives
For a lower bound, fix a balanced bipartition of the vertices and require every edge inside either part to be absent. The resulting graph is bipartite, hence triangle-free, and this event has probability
Combining the bounds proves the second regime.
Put . For any fixed with , let count copies of the cycle graph in . Then
Pairs of distinct -cycles are dependent only when they share an edge. Classifying them by their common paths gives
The first Janson inequality therefore gives
for an absolute and all sufficiently large . Choose so that . A union bound over the at most choices of shows that, with high probability, every set of at least vertices contains a .
Now greedily choose vertex-disjoint -cycles until none remains. If fewer than were chosen, they would cover fewer than vertices, leaving more than vertices and hence another . This contradiction proves that the greedy packing contains at least vertex-disjoint copies.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.