For in two dimensions,
Thus the Laplacian satisfies , and the isotropic harmonic-oscillator operator gives
Split the integral at radius . The Holder inequality on the ball and the spatial moment outside it give
Taking proves the stated estimate with . Choose . If , then
The final two terms form a quadratic polynomial bounded below, so .
Use the Gaussian from part 1. Since ,
The quadratic coefficient is negative because . For every sufficiently small nonzero , the negative quadratic term dominates the quartic term, so and therefore .
Let be a minimizing sequence. The coercive lower bound from part 2 makes it bounded in the harmonic-oscillator energy space and in . After taking a subsequence, converges weakly in both spaces. The compact embedding of the harmonic-oscillator energy space gives strong convergence in , while weak lower semicontinuity of the gradient, moment, and terms yields
Thus attains the infimum. Replacing by does not increase the gradient norm, so a minimizer may be chosen nonnegative. It is nonzero because the infimum is negative whereas .
Taking the first variation against a smooth compactly supported function gives the Euler-Lagrange equation
which is the Schrödinger trapped defocusing stationary equation.
Put and
Differentiate the scaling and quadratic phase. After multiplying the nonlinear Schrödinger equation by , the terms proportional to , , and vanish respectively when
The remaining expression is
which vanishes by part 4. Hence the Schrödinger expanding lens ansatz for the mass-critical equation solves the defocusing cubic equation.
The Riccati equation with has solution
Since , the initial condition gives . Consequently
Finally . In physical time the solution is therefore
The scaling in part 5 gives
Thus . For , the dual Strichartz estimate for the free Schrödinger equation gives
which tends to zero as . The integrals in the question are therefore Cauchy in .
The Duhamel principle in the interaction representation defines an limit and expresses as the tail integral from to infinity. The same estimate sends that tail to zero, proving the scattering from a finite Strichartz norm conclusion

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.