A matching from to is a set of pairwise vertex-disjoint edges that covers every vertex of . Equivalently, it chooses for each a distinct neighbour in .
Hall marriage theorem says that such a matching exists if and only ifNecessity is immediate: the distinct partners of the vertices in all belong to .
For sufficiency, induct on . The claim is clear when . First suppose every nonempty proper satisfies the strict inequality . Choose an edge and delete and . For , deletion removes at most one neighbour, soInduction gives a matching of , and adding completes it.
Otherwise there is a nonempty proper with . Hall's condition holds in the bipartite graph induced by , so induction matches onto . For ,and hence has at least neighbours outside . Induction therefore matches into . The two matchings are disjoint and together cover .
Let the bipartition be . Counting edges from each side givesso . For , the edges leaving all end in , while each vertex of receives at most of them. Thereforeand Hall's condition holds. There is a matching covering , of size . No matching can use more than one edge at each vertex, so this is maximal and
Let be a maximum matching and put . The unmatched vertices form an independent set, since an edge between two of them could be added to . Because is -regular, exactly edges run from unmatched vertices to vertices covered by .
Each endpoint of a matched edge has one incident edge in , and hence at most incident edges from unmatched vertices. The two endpoints of each of the matched edges therefore receive at most such edges. ThusRearranging gives
For every , take the disjoint unionof triangles. This graph is -regular, has vertices, and each triangle contributes exactly one edge to a maximum matching. Henceso equality holds for this infinite family.
The eigenvalues of a graph are the eigenvalues of its adjacency matrix. Order the vertices with those of first and those of second. The adjacency matrix then has block formwhere is the bipartite adjacency matrix.
Since zero is not an eigenvalue, is invertible. If , thena contradiction. Thus . Moreover, if were singular, a nonzero with would give . Hence is invertible.
In the determinant expansionat least one product is nonzero. For its permutation , all entries equal one, so the corresponding edges pair every vertex of with a distinct vertex of . They form the required matching.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.