Write for the yield in replicate of genotype . Model 1 is the one-way cell-means modelThus its three coefficients estimate the three genotype means directly.
Put . Model 2 isIt imposes and . The reported finite-sample p-values assume independent normal errors, a common unknown variance in every genotype, fixed full-rank design matrices, and correctness of the relevant mean model. Random assignment of genotypes supports interpreting the fitted differences as treatment effects.
The displayed analysis of variance compares Model 2 with the unrestricted three-mean Model 1. It testswhich is precisely full dominance: once an allele is present, a second copy has no further effect. Under ,The p-value rejects full dominance at the level, providing evidence that the heterozygote and means differ.
No dominance says that mean yield is affine in the number of alleles:Equivalently, . Fit that reduced model and compare it with Model 1 using
r
model3 <- lm(yield ~ count, data = potato)
anova(model3, model1)The resulting one-degree-of-freedom F-test tests the no-dominance constraint against unrestricted genotype means.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.