True. Take and define , which is well-defined and injective because is injective.
False. A constant surjection from a two-element set to a singleton followed by the singleton’s inclusion is not injective.
False. Include a singleton into a two-element set and then map both elements onto a singleton; the composite need not cover a larger target in analogous examples. Concretely , , , , and let swap/surject with after taking singleton; then the claimed implication fails whenever an element of is reached only outside .
True. If with , then .
Put . There are surjections and injections. For the domain is larger, so cannot be injective, regardless of the choices. For there is only one surjection, so it is injective. For both sets have size ; injectivity depends on the representative choices and, if achieved, is equivalent to bijectivity.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.