The recursive theory is consistent because . By the Gödel-Rosser theorem it has an undecidable sentence , so both and are consistent. Exactly one of is false in ; add that one to . The first-order completeness theorem gives a model, and the Downward Lowenheim-Skolem theorem gives a countable model . Then , but disagrees with on the chosen sentence and is therefore not elementarily equivalent to it.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.