Apply Itô formula to . Its semimartingale decomposition is
The second term is a continuous finite-variation process. Since is assumed to be a local martingale, uniqueness of the semimartingale decomposition makes this term identically zero. Both and are nonzero, so the quadratic variation of is .
The Lévy characterization of Brownian motion now says that is a Brownian motion. Consequently
is a constant multiple of an exponential Brownian martingale. It is therefore a true martingale for every .
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
Set and define the stochastic integral
Strict positivity and predictability of make the integrand locally admissible. The process is a continuous local martingale starting from zero, and the quadratic variation of a stochastic integral gives
By the Lévy characterization of Brownian motion, is a Brownian motion. The associativity of stochastic integration then yields
which is the required representation.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
Use first the test function . The assumed martingale problem says that
is a continuous local martingale. Next use to see that
is a local martingale. On the other hand, Itô formula applied to shows that
is a local martingale. Their difference is both a continuous local martingale and a finite-variation process, so
Part (b), with , supplies a Brownian motion such that
Therefore
so is a weak solution of a stochastic differential equation to the stated equation.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.