At full phase immediately before an exoplanet secondary eclipse, reflected and thermal light give
The phase function equals one at secondary eclipse. For the stated model, the first term is constant below and negligible above it. The thermal component is tiny in the visible, rises through the infrared, and peaks near in , while the contrast continues to improve toward the mid-infrared because the stellar spectrum falls more rapidly.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
Assume full heat redistribution, so
For , , and Bond albedo ,
Taking gives
The reported visible eclipse would therefore imply
which is impossible. At least one assumption, the measurement, or the stated system parameters must fail; even gives only about .
At , reflected light is negligible. The thermal eclipse depth is
With this is
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
A perfectly reflecting Lambertian surface receiving normal flux has radiance
because integrating over the outward hemisphere returns . A face-on disc of radius subtends solid angle . The observed flux is consequently
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
Let and be the top-down optical depths at and , and let be the outward direction cosine. The formal solution of the radiative transfer equation gives
For a semi-infinite lower layer in local thermodynamic equilibrium, .
Define
The emergent planetary surface flux is
Hence the band-centre planet-star ratio is
If , the weights telescope to , so and the expression reduces to the blackbody thermal eclipse depth, about for .
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.
At ,
The normalized flux weights of the , , and layers are therefore
Using the Planck law at the band centre and gives
This is only slightly larger than the isothermal value because the cool upper-layer suppression and hot deep-layer enhancement nearly cancel in this broad weighting.
Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.