The Big O notation means that there exist constants and such that
within the domain of . Thus stays bounded in a punctured neighbourhood of zero. It need not have a limit: is one example. The statement imposes no condition on a separately assigned value .
Use the Maclaurin series on the positive side:
In the last expression the original square root covers , whose leading term is . Hence and . All three are positive for sufficiently small positive , so
Thus is greatest and least in the stated limit.
Apply the ratio test to the infinite series whose partial sums are . Assuming the terms are eventually nonzero and the limit exists, let
If , the series has absolute convergence, by eventual comparison with a decaying geometric series. If , including an infinite limit, the terms fail to tend to zero and the series diverges. If , the test is inconclusive: both and have that ratio limit, but only the second converges. A finite partial sum itself requires no convergence test; the issue is the limit as .
For , the terms do not tend to zero, so the series diverges. For , group the positive terms into the dyadic blocks . Each block contains terms, and monotonicity gives
When , the upper bounds form a convergent geometric series with ratio , proving convergence. When , the lower bounds do not tend to zero, so infinitely many blocks each make a nonvanishing contribution and the sum diverges. Thus the p-series criterion is
This dyadic comparison is the mechanism of the Cauchy condensation test. In particular is the divergent harmonic series.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.