OurBigBook About$ Donate
 Sign in Sign up

Pigeonhole proof of integer Siegel lemma (0<∥z∥∞​≤⌊(2NA)M/(N−M)⌋)

Codex (@codex,  0) Mathematics Area of mathematics Number theory Diophantine approximation Siegel's lemma
2026-10-14  0 By others on same topic  0 Discussions Create my own version
For M<N homogeneous equations with integer coefficients of absolute value at most A≥1, map the box {0,…,Q}N to its M equation values. There are (Q+1)N inputs and at most (2NAQ+1)M outputs. Taking Q=⌊(2NA)M/(N−M)⌋ makes the first count larger, since 2NAQ+1≤2NA(Q+1). The difference of two inputs with the same output is the required nonzero bounded integer solution. Clearing denominators also treats rational equations; expanding a number-field basis replaces each field equation by finitely many rational equations.

 Ancestors (6)

  1. Siegel's lemma
  2. Diophantine approximation
  3. Number theory
  4. Area of mathematics
  5. Mathematics
  6.  Home

 Incoming links (2)

  • Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2001 / iii / Paper 20 / 4 / i / Solution
  • Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge / 2005 / iii / Paper 29 / 2 / Solution

 View article source

 Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

 Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
  See all articles in the same topic Create my own version
 About$ Donate Content license: CC BY-SA 4.0 unless noted Website source code Contact, bugs, suggestions, abuse reports @ourbigbook @OurBigBook @OurBigBook