Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 79 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
We will prove a polynomial progression in a high-energy fourfold difference set. The route is to extract a large subset with a small difference set, construct a dense Freiman s-isomorphism model, and use the Bogolyubov lemma and the pigeonhole principle. To respect the proof requirement, every ingredient beyond the elementary rules for Freiman homomorphisms is established below.
Assume . Since three entries of an additive quadruple determine the fourth, , so a nonvacuous hypothesis has . Let . Then and . Define the popular sum set . The contribution to additive energy from its complement is at most . Since , the bipartite graph on two copies of whose edges have sums in has at least edges. Moreover .
Put and . Here is a dependent random choice argument producing the small difference set. Independently choose two right vertices, allowing repetition, and let be their common left neighbourhood. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives . Call an ordered pair of left vertices bad if its common right neighbourhood has fewer than elements. The expected number of bad ordered pairs in is at most , because a fixed bad pair survives both random choices with probability at most . ThusChoose a realization attaining at least this expectation. Then , and . Remove from every vertex having more than bad partners in . At most vertices are removed. The remaining set has , and any have at least vertices for which both and are good.
For such a , there are at least right vertices adjacent to , and at least right vertices adjacent to . These paths givea representation with four members of . For fixed , the tuple of four sums determines uniquely, so there are at least distinct tuples. Select one ordered pair for each member of . Tuples belonging to different differences are disjoint. Counting all possible tuples in provesIn particular, with , we have and for . This is the required small-difference set form of the Balog-Szemerédi-Gowers theorem, proved by counting paths rather than cited.
We next control higher iterated sumsets. Choose a nonempty minimizing , so . We prove the Petridis minimal-growth lemma in the form for finite . Order , and let consist of those for which is new in the union of the translates . Then . Every member of already occurs in an earlier translate of . By minimality, , also when the complement is empty. Thus the new contribution from is at most . Sum over to prove the lemma. Iterating with gives .
For completeness, the Ruzsa triangle inequality in the needed form isFor each , fix . The map is injective: adding the coordinates recovers , and then . Take , , and apply the preceding bounds. We obtain the Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequalityIn particular has at most elements.
We now prove a slightly wasteful version of the Ruzsa modeling lemma, avoiding any assumption about the diameter of . Set . Choose a prime larger than all , , and much larger than . Arbitrarily large primes exist by the elementary argument that a prime divisor of one plus the product of all primes up to a given bound exceeds that bound. For a uniformly chosen nonzero multiplier modulo , each nonzero has uniform among the nonzero residues. Call a multiplier forbidden if some such agrees modulo with , where . There are at most such residues. For , a union bound therefore makes the probability of being forbidden less thanChoose a nonforbidden . Represent by integers in and partition that interval into sixteen consecutive pieces of diameter less than . One piece contains the images of a subset with . Let be the integer representative of in that piece, reduced modulo .
A difference of eight sums of these representatives has absolute value less than . If its original difference in is zero, it is a multiple of , hence zero. Conversely, if its reduction modulo is zero, it equals with ; our choice of forces its original difference to be zero. This proves that is a Freiman s-isomorphism of order eight. Injectivity follows by padding a one-term equality to eight terms with a fixed element. Consequently has subset densityNo primality of is needed.
Here is the cyclic Bogolyubov lemma with all its Fourier analysis on a finite abelian group details. Use , , and normalized convolution on a finite group. A finite geometric series proves orthogonality, and expanding the finite sums proves the Parseval identity on a finite group, Fourier inversion on a finite group, and . For , the nonnegative functionhas support exactly and Fourier coefficients on a finite abelian group . Put . The Parseval identity on a finite group gives . The total fourth moment of the frequencies outside is at most .
If for every , then . The zero frequency contributes with no loss. Separating the large and small frequencies in Fourier inversion on a finite group yieldsThus contains the Bohr set expressed in distance coordinates by . This is consistent with the existing character-distance convention for a Bohr set: here it is enough that each character lies in the corresponding short arc around one.
We finally prove the needed nonwrapping progression in a cyclic Bohr set, including for composite . Write and . Partition the -dimensional unit cube into boxes. The points with coordinates modulo one, , give by the pigeonhole principle an integer with for all . ThenThese points are distinct modulo , since their integer representatives lie between zero and . Their number is at least . For the same argument simply chooses .
The Freiman s-isomorphism induces a bijection : define it on a representation by taking the same two positive and two negative images. Equality of representations uses an order-four relation, and injectivity uses the converse relation. If three consecutive members of satisfy , their preimages satisfy the same equality, since its expansion is an equality of eight-term sums in . Hence the inverse image of is an ordinary arithmetic progression in , with distinct terms.
To remove the multiplicative constant from the length bound, let and . The length just proved is at least , where . Choose so that for , and set . For , two distinct members of give a nonzero , and has length three, at least . For , the singleton suffices. In every nonempty case,with depending only on . If empty sets are permitted, the required length is zero and there is no substantive assertion.