If finite sets satisfy , then the Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality bounds iterated sumsets and difference sets by
If a nonempty finite set minimizes among the nonempty subsets of , with minimum , then
for every finite set . Iteration is a short proof of the Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality.
For finite subsets of an abelian group with nonempty,
An injective encoding chooses one representation of each element of and translates it by every element of .
For nonempty finite subsets of an arbitrary group,
Choose one representation for each . The map is injective.
If a finite subset of a group satisfies , then repeated use of the Noncommutative Ruzsa triangle inequality gives
Let be a finite subgroup and choose with . For , the set has size at most , while contains the double coset of size . Thus bounded doubling alone gives no tripling bound in arbitrary groups.

Ancestors (6)

  1. Doubling constant
  2. Additive combinatorics
  3. Combinatorics
  4. Area of mathematics
  5. Mathematics
  6. Home

Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.