Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 28 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
All the local fields here carry normalized discrete valuations. Write for the valuation ring, for its maximal ideal, and for its residue field. We use the basic degree identity for finite extensions of non-Archimedean local fields, with the ramification index and the residue degree.
First construct the maximal unramified subextension of a local field extension inside an arbitrary finite extension . Choose a primitive element of a field extension for the finite residue field extension . Let be its monic irreducible minimal polynomial of an algebraic element, of degree , and lift its coefficients to obtain a monic of the same degree. Finite finite fields are perfect fields, so . By Hensel lemma applied in , there is reducing to with . For we haveEvery inequality is therefore an equality. In particular is unramified, , and is the minimal polynomial of an algebraic element .
If is unramified, then , so this construction gives . Taking supplies the required generator, and is a unit. Conversely suppose with integral and its monic minimal polynomial of an algebraic element satisfying . Its coefficients lie in , since all conjugates of an integral element are integral and is complete. In the constructed unramified extension the element is a simple root of . Hensel lemma in produces a root with residue . In both and lift this same simple residue root, so Hensel uniqueness gives . Thus , proving
For lifting residue-field embeddings of unramified extensions, use the generator and polynomial just constructed when is unramified. Given a -field homomorphism , its value is a simple root of . Hensel lemma in produces the unique root with that residue. The assignment defines a -field homomorphism ; it induces because generates . Conversely any such field homomorphism preserves the unique extended valuation, hence induces a residue field homomorphism, and its image of is uniquely forced by Hensel uniqueness. This proves the asserted bijection. The same proof only requires that be a non-Archimedean local field containing with its compatible valuation; its finiteness over is not essential.
Now set . The finite residue field extension has exactly automorphisms, cyclically generated by . Their unique lifts give automorphisms of . Consequently is a Galois extension, and reduction identifies its Galois group with that cyclic residue Galois group. Its generator is the arithmetic Frobenius:
For the compositum, choose a uniformizer of the totally ramified extension . The Eisenstein generator of a totally ramified extension characterization, proved in the next solution, says that and its minimal polynomial of an algebraic element is Eisenstein over . A uniformizer of remains a uniformizer in the unramified extension . All its Eisenstein coefficient conditions therefore remain true over . Thus the same Eisenstein polynomial is irreducible over and generates as a totally ramified extension. This proves is totally ramified, of degree .
Here is an explicit example showing that the converse decomposition of an arbitrary extension can fail. Take and with . Since is irreducible and separable modulo three, the degree and residue-degree argument above shows that is unramified quadratic. PutThe element is a unit in , so is Eisenstein over . Hence , , and . Moreover gives , withWe verify its Galois group, since that is what rules out a totally ramified complement. By Hensel lemma there is with : the residue root of is simple modulo three. Set . ThenThe assignments and respect the defining relation, because . They therefore define a -automorphism of . Its square satisfies and , so has order four. There are thus four automorphisms of the degree-four extension, andThis is the cyclic quartic local extension without a totally ramified complement. Its unique quadratic subfield is , fixed by , and is unramified. If with unramified and totally ramified, then and . To obtain the full degree four both would have degree two, forcing to be a totally ramified quadratic subfield. There is no such subfield. Thus is the required counterexample.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 81 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be an extension of number fields, let be a primitive element of a field extension, and let be its monic minimal polynomial of an algebraic element. Put and . The Kummer-Dedekind theorem applies at a nonzero prime ideal of when : equivalently, is outside the support of the finite-index quotient . Write the factorization over the residue field aswith distinct monic irreducible polynomials , and choose monic lifts . ThenHere denotes the residue-field degree, and the ramification index of a prime ideal is .
To prove this, the local index condition givesThe final isomorphism is the Chinese remainder theorem. Each factor is a local ring with unique maximal ideal generated by , so its inverse image in is exactly , and its residue field is . This proves the list of primes and the residue-field degrees. For the exponents, localize at . The ring of integers of a number field is a Dedekind domain, so is a discrete valuation ring. If , the quotient has successive layers isomorphic to , and hence -dimension . The corresponding polynomial factor has -dimension . Thus , completing the proof rather than merely identifying the radicals.
For the calculation, set and . The ring of integers of a quadratic field gives , with . The algebraic norm of is , so its principal ideal has ideal norm . Its quotient ring has prime order and is therefore the finite field ; consequently is a prime ideal. In that residue field, and .
Let . Since lies in , the permitted identity gives . Thus the local index condition holds at every prime. The relative minimal polynomial of an algebraic element is , whose reduction isThe roots are distinct. Applying the Kummer-Dedekind theorem givesFor the last equality, evaluation at or in gives and therefore . Both descriptions are the same kernels of these evaluation maps. Each prime has ideal norm , residue-field degree one and ramification index of a prime ideal one.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 21 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Normalize the discrete valuations so a uniformiser has value one, and write for the residue fields. The ramification index is specified by , and the residue degree is . For finite extensions of complete discretely valued fields, . One way to see the degree equality is that is a finite free -module of rank ; reduction modulo a uniformiser of has successive quotients isomorphic to , hence dimension over .
An unramified extension has and separable residue extension, equivalently with separable residue extension. A totally ramified extension has , equivalently . The separability condition in the unramified extension definition matters if the residue field is imperfect; it is automatic for finite residue fields.
Suppose is unramified. Choose a primitive element of a field extension for the finite separable extension and lift it to . Since the residue degree of is at least , necessarily . Its monic minimal polynomial of an algebraic element has coefficients in . Its reduction has degree and annihilates , whose minimal polynomial over has that same degree. The two coincide, so is separable.
Conversely, suppose , , and is separable. It must be irreducible: otherwise its coprime factors lift by the factorization form of Hensel's lemma, contradicting irreducibility of . Hence has degree over . The degree equality forces and , and the residue extension is separable. We have proved the unramified generator criterion with separable reduction:
Now let , . Every element of is a simple root of , whose derivative is a unit at each root. Hensel's lemma lifts each of these elements uniquely to a root in . Thus contains all roots of ; these are the nonzero Teichmuller lifts.
More generally, a root of unity of order prime to reduces injectively into . Indeed, if such a root reduces to , uniqueness in Hensel's lemma for makes it equal to . Consequently every prime-to- order divides .
A root whose order has a nontrivial -part produces a primitive th root of unity . It reduces to in characteristic . Sinceall the factors have the same positive integral valuation. HenceThis is the ramification bound for a primitive pth root of unity. ThereforeFor the hypothesis cannot occur, so that instance is vacuous rather than a claim excluding the ever-present root .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 3 18G b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
The eleventh cyclotomic field hasThe cyclic group has exactly one subgroup of each order . The Galois correspondence therefore gives exactly four subfields:The Quadratic Gaussian period in the eleventh cyclotomic field satisfies , while generates the maximal real subfield of the eleventh cyclotomic field. Every subgroup of the abelian Galois group is normal, so all four subfields are Galois over .
Each nontrivial proper subfield has prime degree, two or five. If , then , and the tower law forces . Thus every such element is a primitive element. The displayed and are the requested examples. Finally, itself is a primitive element for .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 ii Paper 1 18I b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
The seventh cyclotomic polynomial isIt is irreducible over , and all its roots , , lie in . Hence is a degree-six Finite Galois extension, withThe group is cyclic of order six; for example,
By the Galois correspondence, the subfields are the fixed fields of the four subgroups of :Thus these are all the subfields.
For the Quadratic Gaussian period in the seventh cyclotomic field, putThe cyclotomic relation gives , while direct multiplication gives . HenceIts discriminant is , so
For the real cubic subfield of the seventh cyclotomic field, divideby . With ,soThis cubic has no rational root, and therefore
The requested primitive elements, minimal polynomials, and automorphism groups are consequentlyMore explicitly, the nontrivial automorphism of sendsand the three automorphisms of cyclically permute
Finally, is abelian, so every subgroup is normal. The subextensions of an abelian Galois extension theorem shows that
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 136 5 a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
The Ostrowski theorem says that every nontrivial absolute value on a field defined on is equivalent either to the usual absolute value or to for a unique prime .
Let an absolute value on the number field extend . Its valuation ring determinesa prime ideal satisfying . Conversely, each prime above defines the normalized absolute valuewhere . It restricts to . The correspondence between extensions and primes follows either from the valuation ring or from local factorization and extended absolute values; distinct primes give inequivalent valuations. Thus these are exactly the extensions, up to equivalence.
For the tensor-product assertion, choose a primitive element of a field extension for , with minimal polynomial . Because number fields are separable, over it factors into distinct irreduciblesindexed by the primes . The Chinese remainder theorem givesThe th factor is the completion of a number field at a prime ideal . Under these identifications the isomorphism is the natural diagonal map , proving the p-adic tensor decomposition of a number field
Primitive element of a field extension Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The primitive element theorem proves existence under finite separability; the primitive element of a field extension is the generator whose existence the theorem asserts.
Let and for algebraically independent . The monomials with form a basis, whereas every satisfies . Thus but , so no primitive element of a field extension exists.