Let and use the velocity-anisotropy parameter , with . Here the tangential variance is per component; a definition using the sum of both tangential variances instead has an extra factor of two. The original PDF has this correct per-component ratio, which the TeX corrupts.
At a point along the line of sight, . The radial direction makes an angle with the sightline satisfying . Spherical symmetry eliminates mixed moments, and projection gives
Using both sides of the galaxy and ,
For this formula use as the projected density of the same tracer represented by . If is a mass density and an observed surface brightness, a constant mass-to-light ratio rescales by that factor; otherwise replace by the luminosity density throughout the tracer equation. The gravitating remains the total mass, not necessarily the tracer's mass.
The Spherical Jeans equation is . Eliminate from the projected integrand:
Rearranging proves
No constancy of was needed. Convergence of the projected moments and the steady spherical assumptions are required. This is the integral form of the projected spherical Jeans residual.
Although has disappeared explicitly, the unknown radial pressure still carries the orbital information. Thus the identity does not remove the mass--anisotropy--density degeneracy: projected brightness and one projected second moment do not uniquely determine both and the radial/tangential partition. A central rise in velocity dispersion can reflect a compact central mass, radial orbital bias, or a changing mass-to-light ratio; flattening and departures from equilibrium add further ambiguities.
For example, within a point-mass-dominated region with tracer and constant , direct solution gives . For the projected velocity dispersion of a Keplerian cusp is
The beta function factors come from setting in the integrals along the line of sight. Different allowed generally change the mass needed to fit the same normalization; is a special cancellation, not the general case. Resolving the central black-hole sphere of influence and constraining orbital structure with higher velocity moments or additional kinematic directions strengthens a compact-mass inference. Brightness and velocity dispersion profiles alone do not establish a unique central black-hole mass, still less an event horizon.