Pulse-width uncertainty from correlated edge timing depends on the joint errors of the two crossing times, not just their separate uncertainties. For specified leading and trailing crossings tr,tf, let W=tf−tr. Their variance identity isThis is exact for the stated difference of random times. Approximating the edge errors from waveform measurements may require a local model. NIST's primary uncertainty law explicitly retains covariance terms.[ref]
uW2=uf2+ur2−2Cov(tf,tr)=uf2+ur2−2ρufur.
A common time translation illustrates cancellation. Suppose measured edges have errors c+er and c+ef, with independent zero-mean components. The pulse width error is ef−er; the common c disappears. For an original example, take standard deviations 20ns for c, 2ns for er, and 3ns for ef. Individual edge uncertainties are about 20.10 and 20.22ns, but pulse width uncertainty is only 13≈3.606ns. Incorrectly treating the two full edge errors as independent would give 813≈28.51ns.
A common timing-scale error is different. If measured times obey tmeas=(1+g)t+c, then Wmeas=(1+g)W: the offset cancels but the scale error remains. For a 100μs pulse width, a 10 parts-per-million standard scale uncertainty contributes 1ns. If independent of the residual edge errors above, it raises the combined standard uncertainty to 14≈3.742ns.
Nor does every shared voltage error make the edges positively correlated. A fixed threshold shift can move a rising crossing later and a falling crossing earlier, increasing pulse width uncertainty. The waveform slopes and shared references determine the covariance sign. A measurement should therefore record its level convention and model the two edges together. Keysight's documented pulse width uses the rising and next falling 50-percent crossings.[ref]
Pulse Width in Keysight BenchVue Function Generator documentation. Pulse Width, threshold definition
These uncertainty calculations assume both crossings exist; missing or multiply selected edges need a separate observation model. Articles by others on the same topic (0)
There are currently no matching articles.