Unimodal distribution 2026-11-05
A unimodal distribution, under the density or mass-function convention, has probabilities that rise toward one central region and then fall away. For an absolutely continuous probability distribution, this means it has a probability density function that is nondecreasing up to a mode and nonincreasing afterward. This is the single-maximum meaning of unimodality; the chosen density is a one-dimensional quasiconcave function. A plateau of maximizing points is allowed.
For a discrete original example on outcomes0,1,2and3, choose probabilities0.1,0.4,0.4and0.1. The probability mass function rises, has two adjacent maximizing values, then falls. It is unimodal under the weak monotonicity definition despite not having a unique mode. In contrast, separated high-probability regions with a genuine dip between them are not one mode plateau.
Unimodality does not imply symmetry or equality of arithmetic mean, median and mode. For the exponential distribution with density on , , the mode is0, the mean is and the median is . The density decreases from its boundary maximum. The NIST handbook gives the family and these summary characteristics, using a scale parameter reciprocal to this rate parameter.[ref]
Nor is unimodality generally preserved by a mixture distribution. Equal mixing of uniform distributions on and gives density1/2 on those two intervals and zero in between. Each component has a flat unimodal density, while the mixture has separated peaks.
A density is defined only up to changes on sets of measure zero. Thus the distributional statement concerns existence of a representative with the required shape, rather than artificial isolated spikes added to one displayed formula. In higher dimensions, several notions of unimodality are used; one convex-level-set formulation requires convex superlevel sets, as in the quasiconcave function definition.[ref] The shape convention should be specified before extending a one-dimensional conclusion to another setting.
Unimodality 2026-11-05
Unimodality, in the single-maximum convention, means that a real-valued function rises toward one mode or plateau and then falls away. More precisely, for a function on an interval, there is a point such that is nondecreasing to the left of and nonincreasing to its right. These inequalities are weak: a flat top is allowed, and more than one point may achieve the maximum.
For an original example,
is zero throughout and decreases as one moves outward beyond that plateau. It is unimodal despite lacking a unique maximizing point. In contrast, two separated peaks with a genuine dip between them violate the rise-then-fall requirement.
A useful characterization is that a unimodal function in this convention has interval-shaped superlevel sets . For a function attaining its maximum, the converse holds too: if all those sets are intervals, a decline followed by a later rise on the same side of a maximizer would create a disconnected superlevel set. In one dimension this is the quasiconcave function viewpoint. Boyd and Vandenberghe define quasiconcavity through convex superlevel sets.[ref]
The convention must be stated. In minimization, unimodal is also used for a function that first decreases and then increases; that corresponds to a quasiconvex function and interval-shaped sublevel sets. A single minimum and a single maximum are opposite shape conditions.
Unimodality also differs from concavity. The function has derivative , so it rises up to zero and falls afterward. However,
so it is not a concave function on the whole real line. Unimodality constrains the ordering of levels rather than the sign of curvature everywhere.
For a probability density, this shape defines one common meaning of a unimodal distribution. Adding symmetry around zero strengthens the conclusion: the centred interval maximizes mass for an even unimodal density lemma shows why a fixed-width observation window collects most probability when centered on the mode.