For any ideal in a commutative ring, every prime ideal containing contains , because implies . Conversely, if , the multiplicatively closed set is disjoint from . By Zorn's lemma, there is an ideal maximal among those disjoint from .
This is a prime ideal: if but , maximality makes both and meet . Multiplication of representatives from these two intersections puts an element of in , a contradiction. Thus there is a prime ideal containing but avoiding , establishing the identity. For , the intersection is empty and means . It follows that an ideal is a radical ideal exactly when it is an intersection of ideals that are all prime ideals.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.