For a subgroup , the restriction of a -character to is the -character obtained by evaluating the same function only on elements of .
An extension of from is a character of whose restriction is exactly . It is necessarily irreducible, because a nontrivial invariant subspace for would also be one for . An ordinary extension can fail to exist even when is invariant under .
Let and let be invariant under . If is coprime to , then extends to if and only if its determinant character extends to a linear character of . In particular, if the determinant order is also coprime to the index, there is a unique extension whose determinant order is coprime to the index. When is a p-group and , every invariant irreducible character of degree prime to satisfies this latter determinant condition.
Under the invariant, coprime-degree and determinant hypotheses of the coprime-degree determinant extension theorem, without assuming solvable, each cyclic-quotient subgroup has a unique determinant-normalized extension. Use its value at to define . Uniqueness makes conjugacy-invariant. On an elementary subgroup , it agrees with the restriction of the extension to , since is a solvable quotient of . Brauer's characterization of characters therefore makes a generalized character, with .
Suppose , is solvable, is invariant under , and is coprime to . If a linear character of restricts to the determinant character , then there is a unique character extension with determinant . This is the solvable-quotient extension result supplied for the exam's application.
For and , set . Its inertia group is its stabilizer under this conjugation action and contains . Write for the irreducible characters of whose restriction to contains .
For , and , induction gives the displayed bijection. The inverse takes the -isotypic component of an irreducible -module, viewed as a -module. Induction produces distinct -isotypic components indexed by . Any nonzero -submodule meets one of them and hence, by translation and irreducibility over , contains them all. The same argument shows that the inverse component is irreducible and determines the original inducing module uniquely.
If is an irreducible character of a finite group and , thenEquality holds exactly when vanishes on .
Let have index two, and let be the nontrivial linear character of inflated to . For an irreducible character of , either is irreducible and , or the restriction is a sum of two distinct irreducible characters and .
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.