The completed Dirichlet L-function is
For nonprincipal primitive Dirichlet characters, termwise Mellin transformation initially in gives
The Dirichlet character theta function decays exponentially at infinity; its transformation makes it decay faster than any power at zero. Hence the integral is entire in . For even parity, substitute and the theta transformation to obtain
The same calculation with the extra power gives the odd functional equation with its corresponding root number.
The gamma function has no zeros and has simple poles at nonpositive integers. Thus the nontrivial zeros of and coincide with multiplicities. The trivial zeros of a Dirichlet L-function are for a nonprincipal even character, and for an odd character. They cancel the gamma poles and are not zeros of : the functional equation takes these points to the zero-free right-hand region, including the standard nonvanishing of nonprincipal Dirichlet L-functions at one at the even endpoint. The canceled zeros are simple.
The principal primitive Dirichlet character has conductor of a Dirichlet character equal to one and . In that case is meromorphic with poles at zero and one. Its canceled trivial zeros begin at , while is not zero. Multiplication by produces the entire Riemann xi function used below.
The Riemann xi function is the entire function
with . Its Hadamard factorization is
where the Nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function are repeated by multiplicity and the factors are canonical genus-one factors.
Here is the growth estimate needed for the Jensen zero-count bound. For , functional symmetry reduces to . Euler summation truncated at bounds by a fixed power of , uniformly in that region; the multiplication cancels the pole at one. The logarithmic gamma estimate bounds by , including the bounded small- part separately. The remaining elementary factors obey the same bound. Thus
For a zero with , its contribution in Jensen's formula on radius is at least . Consequently
If a zero lies on the integration circle, use nearby radii and continuity of the zero-count estimate. Hence for . The growth also gives order at most one and justifies the stated Hadamard factorization; the zero-count bound gives convergence of its genus-one factors.
The printed logarithmic Stirling hint drops the term . The correct expansion is in a fixed sector. Its consequence is all that the argument needs.