Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 73 4 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Use small Rossby number , slow evolution on the advective time scale, small interface displacements relative to each layer depth, shallow hydrostatic layers, stable reduced gravity , and inviscid unforced flow. On a beta plane, take of the same small order as the Rossby number. The internal Burger number is retained at order unity so stratification and relative-vorticity effects can both enter the leading potential-vorticity anomaly.
The rigid-lid pressure in two-layer flow comes from neglecting the free-surface volume displacement in the rigid-lid approximation; it does not permit setting the common horizontal pressure gradient to zero. The small surface displacement multiplied by retains a finite lid-pressure multiplier. Write , , and let denote this common pressure potential. Leading geostrophic balance giveswith at leading order. Literally setting to a spatial constant in the momentum gradients before taking the rigid-lid limit would suppress the upper-layer pressure field and fail to produce general two-layer QG dynamics.
Taking curl of each shallow-water momentum equation and using layer continuity gives material conservation of . Expanding it to first order and advecting the anomaly by the leading geostrophic velocity yieldsThe two-layer quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity equations areHere the common background has been removed and the anomaly multiplied by . The advection term is retained at the same slow order as the time derivative even though the leading velocity/pressure balance was linear geostrophy. On an plane simply set .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 ii Paper 4 35E Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
To recover the printed dispersion relation, interpret the surface maintained flat as an imposed flat upper boundary for the perturbation, so its normal velocity is zero. This is the rigid-lid approximation. Work with perturbation velocity potentials below the interface and in the upper layer. They solve the Laplace equation, decay as , and obey .
The linear kinematic boundary conditions at the interface give and . Equality of pressures, using the linear Bernoulli equation, gives . The equal fluid densities cancel the interface gravitational restoring term. Eliminating yieldsWith , the roots areFor every one root has positive real part. Thus the vortex sheet has a Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at every wavelength in this model. If , and the growing rate is . If , and it is .
There is a physical qualification to the wording. A dynamically deformable free surface at finite gravity is not exactly a flat lid. Its linear conditions combine to . Writing the upper potential as and using the same interface conditions instead givesThe stated quadratic follows in the strong-gravity flat-surface limit, or with the flat condition imposed exactly. It is not the exact dispersion relation of a freely moving upper surface at arbitrary finite . This makes explicit the boundary interpretation needed for the requested formula.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 333 3 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For a zonal basic geostrophic flow , take and write . The flat-bottom shallow-water quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity gradient of the basic state isLinearizing its material conservation gives the Rossby-wave equation for a sheared zonal current,For a general nonuniform jet, a global two-dimensional plane wave is not an exact normal mode: the coefficients depend on . The exact zonal normal mode problem, , iswith appropriate transverse boundary or radiation conditions. If the jet varies slowly compared with a wavelength, a local plane wave freezes these coefficients at . Its local dispersion relation isIn the nondivergent Barotropic Rossby wave model under a rigid-lid approximation, this becomes . It is exact for uniform and otherwise a local relation. Retaining the free-surface term also requires retaining the basic surface slope in ; simply adding to the denominator while dropping from the numerator would describe a different prescribed-background model.
Rigid-lid pressure in two-layer flow 2026-10-07
The rigid-lid approximation removes external surface displacement from volume conservation while retaining its pressure as a constraint multiplier. It does not mean zero horizontal pressure gradient. In two-layer geostrophic flow, and , so the upper-layer depth anomaly is . This pressure difference supplies internal potential-vorticity coupling.