Identify with the Jacobian variety using the base point and the translation of Solution 4. A line bundle of degree corresponds to the point for any divisor representation . The Riemann singularity theorem is
In particular, the theta divisor is singular exactly at the degree- line bundles with at least two independent sections. We prove the equality, including the upper bound on multiplicity.
Choose a fixed effective divisor of degree , and a local holomorphic family representing nearby points of . Such a family can be constructed locally from the holomorphic exponential sequence, by varying line-bundle transition functions through exponentials of Čech cohomology representatives. By Serre duality, is dual to , whose degree is , so it vanishes. The Riemann-Roch theorem gives . By cohomology and base change for line bundles on a curve, these spaces form a holomorphic vector bundle of rank . The spaces form another holomorphic vector bundle of rank . Evaluation gives a holomorphic square matrix locally, with exact sequence
Consequently exactly when has a nonzero section, namely on the support of the theta divisor.
At the point , put , the equality being Riemann-Roch theorem. An invertible minor of size persists near this point. Holomorphic row and column operations, or the Schur complement, give
where is an holomorphic matrix. This is the Schur complement presentation of a theta singularity. Its linear term in a tangent direction is the cup product map
To see this concretely, vary transition functions of to . A section lifts to precisely when its first-order compatibility equation can be solved; the obstruction is the cocycle . This is . Passing to the kernel and cokernel of gives exactly the derivative of the reduced matrix , proving the assertion without assuming a multiplicity formula.
Before extracting the order of , we verify that is a reduced equation of the theta divisor. Generic points of have by Solution 3. At such a point, both and are one-dimensional. Their nonzero sections have nonzero product . Choose with under Serre duality. The scalar is nonzero, so has a simple zero generically on the irreducible theta divisor. Since its support is exactly that irreducible hypersurface, it defines the reduced divisor. Solution 4 independently proved the same reduced structure for the Riemann theta function. On the smooth ambient Jacobian variety, local equations of the same reduced divisor differ by a nonvanishing holomorphic unit. Hence the orders of the local theta equation and agree everywhere.
Every entry of vanishes at the point, so each term in its determinant has order at least . This proves . To obtain equality, we exhibit an invertible cup-product direction for a line bundle on a curve. Set and , both of dimension . There are distinct points at which evaluation is an isomorphism for : choose them inductively, since a surviving nonzero section has only finitely many zeros. The same holds for . The nonvanishing of each evaluation determinant defines a nonempty open subset of the irreducible variety . Their intersection, also avoiding the diagonals, is therefore nonempty. Choose points in it and local coordinates and compatible trivializations of and at each point.
Let be the connecting homomorphism class of the meromorphic principal parts at these points, with all . The residue form of Serre duality gives
If and are the two invertible evaluation matrices, the matrix of this pairing is , and is invertible. Thus the cup product map is an isomorphism. Along the corresponding analytic parameter line,
with nonzero leading coefficient. The order is at most , completing the proof of the Riemann singularity theorem.
This argument also identifies the tangent cone to a theta divisor: its degree- equation is , which is not the zero polynomial. For , the tangent hyperplane is , in agreement with the annihilator description of the derivative of the Abelian sum map. For all first derivatives vanish, proving singularity. In genus the theta divisor is a single smooth point of multiplicity . In genus the effective degree- locus is empty, so there is no singularity statement at a point of it.