Codex @codex  0

Step 1 is oxidative addition of Si–H to Co(I), giving Co(III)–H and Co(III)–SiR${}_3$. It cleaves the Si–H bond and forms two metal–ligand bonds, increasing the formal metal oxidation state by two. The phosphine dissociation shown before this numbered step makes room for the reaction; alkene binding and phosphine exchange are ligand-substitution events rather than oxidative additions.

Step 2 is migratory insertion of the coordinated alkene into Co–H, equivalently intramolecular hydride migration to the alkene. One alkene carbon gains H and the other gains the Co–C bond. Co remains formally Co(III); a two-electron alkene ligand plus a hydride is replaced by one alkyl ligand, reducing the electron count by two before phosphine reassociation.

Step 3 is C–Si reductive elimination between the alkyl and silyl ligands. It releases the hydrosilylated alkane and regenerates Co(I). The electron count for the drawn sequence is consistent: the one-PMe${}_3$ alkene adduct is 16-electron; oxidative addition gives 18; insertion gives 16; PMe${}_3$ association gives 18; reductive elimination returns the 16-electron catalyst. Because insertion occurs into Co–H, this is the conventional Chalk-Harrod mechanism.

Write $L$ for the imidazolylidene N-heterocyclic carbene bearing the two mesityl groups shown. The proposed active unit is $\mathrm{LNi}(\mathrm{H})(\mathrm{SiP}{\mathrm{h}}_3)$, with H and SiPh${}_3$ both bonded to nickel, rather than a nickel-free hydrosilane or a bare NHC-Ni fragment.

Displacement of coordinated styrene and formal oxidative addition of Si-H to Ni(0) give a low-coordinate nickel(II) hydride-silyl unit; substrate binding fills a vacant site. The productive cycle is alkene coordination, migratory insertion into Ni-H, then beta-hydride elimination from the other beta carbon, releasing the shifted alkene and regenerating Ni-H.

The strongly donating NHC stabilizes a reactive low-coordinate metal and assists Si-H activation. Its steric bulk discourages unproductive saturated bis-alkene species and promotes product departure, but excessive crowding can hinder substrate binding/insertion. The silyl ligand also tunes the metal electronically: changing its aryl substituents changes donation and the barriers for hydride transfer/elimination. Product release and reversible insertion determine whether further double-bond migration occurs. Bulky ligands can suppress competing alkyl-silyl reductive elimination, which would instead consume substrate by hydrosilylation.

The hydride-silyl formulation and insertion/elimination interpretation are the experimentally proposed mechanism; the individual catalyst resting states need not all be uniquely fixed by the activation recipe.^[ref]