Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 149 1 b Solution 2026-10-03
The Noncommutative Ruzsa triangle inequality says that nonempty finite subsets of a group satisfyThe Ruzsa covering lemma says that if , then some with satisfies
Now let be a symmetric subset of a group, so and . Apply the triangle inequality with the middle set to obtain, for ,The hypothesis therefore gives . Starting from proves
In particular . Apply the covering lemma to and . There is with such thatThe set is symmetric and contains the identity element, so this inclusion is exactly the covering condition showing that
Small doubling alone is insufficient in a noncommutative group. Let be a finite group, let be its free product with an infinite cyclic group, and putThen is symmetric and , while contains the double coset . Distinct pairs give distinct reduced words , so . Letting proves the small doubling does not control tripling in a noncommutative group phenomenon.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 129 1 iii Solution 2026-09-28
On the other hand, contains the double coset . Reduced-word uniqueness in the free product makes the mapinjective, so . Taking finite groups of unbounded order keeps the doubling constant below three while tends to infinity. This realizes the small doubling does not control tripling in a noncommutative group phenomenon.